FOR LATEST HEADNOTES OF JUDGEMENTS OF SUPREME COURT OF INDIA AND LATEST LEGAL UPDATES VISIT 
indianlegalreporter.in
legal articles are welcome
advocates shcolars who want send their legal article are wecome
send your articles with the declaration that the article is their own not copied and reproductive, and he personally liable for violations 
bbb
POLICE SHALL REGISTER FIR

Mandatory FIR Registration under Section 154 CrPC
->FOR JUDGEMENT/HEAD NOTES IN ENGLISH AND TELUGU

				
				
				
			

			 
		




			
			
			
			
			




				
				
				
				





			

				bbb
			

			

				
					


				
				
the right to claim compensation survives to the legal representatives, even if the death is unrelated to the injury.


->FOR JUDGEMENT/HEAD NOTES IN ENGLISH AND TELUGU


				
			

			 
		





			

				bbb
			

			

				
					


				
				
If the contract expressly bars pendente lite interest, the arbitrator has no power to grant it.

->FOR JUDGEMENT/HEAD NOTES IN ENGLISH AND TELUGU



				
			

			 
		








			
			
			
			
			




				
				
				
				





			

				bbb
			

			

				
					


				
				
Without pleadingsin writtenstatement, additional evidence is irrelevant and inadmissible.

->FOR JUDGEMENT/HEAD NOTES IN ENGLISH AND TELUGU

				
			

			 
		





			

				bbb
			

			

				
					
Once the MV Act remedy was chosen, the insurer could not fall back on the Workmen’s Compensation Act provisions.
->FOR JUDGEMENT/HEAD NOTES IN ENGLISH AND TELUGU

				
				


				
			

			 
		









			

				bbb
			

			

				
					
The Insurance Company objected to bills from Goa and Bengaluru, but the Court held that since the company has offices nationwide, it cannot deny verification.
->FOR JUDGEMENT/HEAD NOTES IN ENGLISH AND TELUGU

				
				


				
			

			 
		




			
			
			
			
			




				
				
				
				





			

				bbb
			

			

				
					
The Tribunal dismissed the review, stating it had no power under the Motor Vehicles Act to review its own award.
->FOR JUDGEMENT/HEAD NOTES IN ENGLISH AND TELUGU

				
				


				
			

			 
		




			
			
			
			
			




				
				
				
				





			

				bbb
			

			

				
					


				
				
While motor accident claims are judged on probability, when the FIR itself is questionable and the eyewitness evidence unreliable, the claim loses credibility.
->FOR JUDGEMENT/HEAD NOTES IN ENGLISH AND TELUGU

				
			

			 
		








			
			
			
			
			




				
				
				
				





			

				bbb
			

			

				
					
 the High Court was justified in quashing the proceedings as there was no material connecting him to the alleged crime.

				
				
h->FOR JUDGEMENT/HEAD NOTES IN ENGLISH AND TELUGU

				
			

			 
		








			
			
			
			
			




				
				
				
				





			

				bbb
			

			

				
					
 





 As regards Bhanwar Singh, mere alleged threats did not establish conspiracy or participation in murder. No substantive evidence connected him.offence against him quashed.
->FOR JUDGEMENT/HEAD NOTES IN ENGLISH AND TELUGU

				
				


				
			

			 
		




			
			
			
			
			




				
				
				
				





			

				bbb
			

			

				
					


				
				
The “High Court” definition restricting eligibility to practice within Telangana only was unconstitutional.

				
			

			 
		




			
			
			
			
			




				
				
				
				





			

				bbb
			

			

				
					
Vague and general allegations cannot form the basis of a prima facie case.



				
				
   The FIR against the appellants only contained general statements and a solitary incident (demand for clothes and jewellery). No specific or grave acts of cruelty were alleged against them.

				
			

			 
		




			
			
			
			
			




				
				
				
				





			

				bbb
			

			

				
					


				
				
The lease deed required prior written consent of the Lieutenant Governor for any mortgage. No such consent was taken before the club mortgaged the property to the Bank. Therefore, the mortgage itself was unlawful.



				
			

			 
		





			

				bbb
			

			

				
					
The Government had the discretion to condone the appellant’s overage for an aided post.

				
				
Respondent No.5 stood second and cannot challenge the selection merely because age was condoned in abundant caution.

				
			

			 
		
















			
			
			
			
			




				
				
				
				





			

				bbb
			

			

				
					


				
				
Violation of Procedural Mandate
Allowing the defendant to file a reply without leave amounts to bypassing sub-rules (4) and (5) of Rule 3, which regulate the steps after appearance. Such deviation “goes to the root of the matter,” rendering the High Court’s order unsustainable in law.

				
			

			 
		








			
			
			
			
			




				
				
				
				





			

				bbb
			

			

				
					
Parminder Singh v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (2019),
the Court reiterated that even if there is a technical violation by the insured, the rights of the third-party victims must be protected. The insurer must pay compensation to the claimant and subsequently recover the amount from the insured.

				
				


				
			

			 
		




			
			
			
			
			




				
				
				
				





			

				bbb
			

			

				
					
Abuse of Process of Law
The FIR and charge sheet were found to be an abuse of the criminal process, since the dispute concerns recovery of money and enforcement of contracts — matters that should be decided in civil courts, not criminal courts.

				
				


				
			

			 
		












			
			
			
			
			




				
				
				
				





			

				bbb
			

			

				
					
This is an Image Box

				
				
If There was no dishonest or fraudulent intention on the part of the appellant at the time of entering into the agreement for sale. The mere failure to perform the contract or refund money does not constitute a criminal offence.

				
			

			 
		








			
			
			
			
			




				
				
				
				





			

				bbb
			

			

				
					
Vague and General Allegations:

				
				
The Supreme Court observed that the FIR contained omnibus and vague allegations without specifying any date, time, place, or specific act of cruelty or harassment attributed to the appellant. The complainant merely alleged “mental harassment for dowry” but did not describe any concrete instance.

				
			

			 
		




			
			
			
			
			




				
				
				
				





			

				bbb
			

			

				
					


				
				
The Supreme Court noted that the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) disposed of the consumer complaint based only on the offer made by the builder’s counsel to refund the principal with 9% interest, without recording any acceptance by the complainant or examining the merits of the case. Hence, the order was legally flawed..

				
			

			 
		






















				
				
				
				




free legal help to POOR who not able to prosecute cases before high courts and supreme court of india. contact:9866710060

		
			




  GOOD NEWS TO JUNIOR ADVOCATES




practicle training to junior advocates who intended to practice law without senior




WE 




WE CAN DRAFT CASES PEITITONS FOR YOU, ARGUE CASES FOR YOU, GIVE GUIDANCE FOR ENTIRE CASE PROCEEDINGS AT NOMINAL FEES, YOU CAN PRACTICE LAW WITHOUT SENIOR, ALL CASES  CRIMINAL AND CIVIL , WE CAN GUIDEYOU FOR ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS AT  NOMINAL FEES














			
			
			
			
			




				
				
				
				




			



  
  Color Changing Link
  


  FREE LISTING TO ALL ADVOCATES FOR ONE YEAR 
SEND -YOUR NAME ,ADDRESS, ENROLLMNT NUMBER(KEPT SECRET IF SPECIFY)MOBILE NUMBER, AREA OF PRACTICE  WITH REQUEST DATE-TO varaju6666@gmail.com,  or click here, it will be displayed within 3 days ,

		








			
			
			
			
			




				
				
				
				







  
  Color Changing Link
  


  IT IS FREE , NO LOGIN , NO FREE TRIAL, ALWAY FREE, NO HIDEN RESTIRICTIONS, VISIT INDIANLEGALREPORTER FOR LEGAL KNOWLEDGE FOR EVER 











			
			
			
			
			




				
				
				
				




			
1-10

		






				
				
				
				




			
1

		






				
				
				
				




			
2

		






				
				
				
				




			
3